Skip to main content
Categorized under: Policy, Power Plants

Public Health and Environmental Coalition Argues D.C. Circuit Should Vacate Unlawful Rollback of Clean Power Plan

(Washington, D.C. – April 17, 2020) The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit should vacate EPA’s “unlawful replacement” for the Clean Power Plan and remand the issue to the agency so it can swiftly establish meaningful protections against carbon pollution from existing power plants, according to public health and environmental advocates.

Environmental Defense Fund, Natural Resources Defense Council, Sierra Club, Clean Air Task Force on behalf of its clients, and ten other public health and environmental organizations filed their opening brief with the D.C. Circuit today in litigation against what they call the “cynically misnamed Affordable Clean Energy Rule (ACE).”

“The Rule is a blatant abdication of EPA’s statutory duty to protect the public from air pollution that the agency itself has repeatedly found poses grave and imminent dangers to health and welfare,” the groups say in their brief. “Rather than cutting dangerous carbon dioxide pollution from power plants, the Environmental Protection Agency issued a rule that distorts the law and facts, accomplishes negligible emission reduction, and hamstrings the agency’s future authority.” (Brief, pages 5 and 1)

Last June, the Trump administration finalized an effort to scrap the Clean Power Plan and replace it with the ACE rule. The Clean Power Plan was the historic effort to address climate change by establishing America’s only nationwide limit on carbon pollution from existing power plants. The ACE rule will yield no meaningful reduction in dangerous climate pollution — and could even lead to increases in harmful soot- and smog-forming pollution in many parts of the country.

The brief argues that EPA’s decision to repeal the Clean Power Plan was based on a fundamental misreading of the Clean Air Act that would force EPA to ignore common-sense, cost-effective emission reduction measures and would “frustrate the Act’s capacity to reduce the enormous amount of climate pollution emitted by fossil fuel-fired power plants.) As the brief points out, “a revised rule, based on the [Clean Power] Plan’s framework but using current data, could achieve nearly twice as much CO2 reduction by 2030 at less than the original estimated cost.” (Brief, pages 2 and 4)

The brief also argues the ACE rule unlawfully fails to establish any minimum requirements for reduction in pollution from existing coal-fired power plants and violates the Clean Air Act by placing no limits on the large and growing amounts of climate pollution emitted by gas- and oil-fired power plants.

The American Lung Association, American Public Health Association, Appalachian Mountain Club, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Center for Biological Diversity, Clean Air Council, Clean Wisconsin, Conservation Law Foundation, Environmental Law & Policy Center and Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy joined EDF, NRDC, Clean Air Task Force and Sierra Club on today’s brief.

23 states and eight local governments, nine power companies, and several clean energy trade associations are also suing EPA over the ACE rule.

A diverse and growing number of experts and organizations have also notified the court that they intend to file amicus, or “friend of the court,” briefs opposing the rollback of the Clean Power Plan. That group includes five of the nation’s most prominent health and medical associations, the Institute for Policy Integrity at NYU Law School, seven leading experts in administrative law, one of the authors of the Clean Air Act, organizations dedicated to the conservation of national parks, a group of leading climate scientists and economists, and the Union of Concerned Scientists.

###

Environmental Defense Fund (edf.org), a leading international nonprofit organization, creates transformational solutions to the most serious environmental problems. EDF links science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships. Connect with us on EDF VoicesTwitter and Facebook.

The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with more than 3 million members and online activists. Since 1970, our lawyers, scientists, and other environmental specialists have worked to protect the world’s natural resources, public health, and the environment. NRDC has offices in New York City, Washington, D.C., Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Bozeman, MT, and Beijing. Visit us at www.nrdc.org and follow us on Twitter @NRDC.​

Clean Air Task Force (CATF), a non-traditional and fact based organization pushing the change in technologies and policies needed to get to a zero-emissions, high-energy planet at an affordable cost. Connect with us on Twitter.

The Sierra Club is America’s largest and most influential grassroots environmental organization, with more than 3.8 million members and supporters. In addition to protecting every person’s right to get outdoors and access the healing power of nature, the Sierra Club works to promote clean energy, safeguard the health of our communities, protect wildlife, and preserve our remaining wild places through grassroots activism, public education, lobbying, and legal action. For more information, visit www.sierraclub.org.

Contact:

Sharyn Stein, EDF, 202-905-5718, sstein@edf.org

Jake Thompson, NRDC 301-602-3627, jthompson@nrdc.org

Stuart Ross, CATF, 914-649-5037, sross@catf.us

Melissa Williams, Sierra Club, 828-545-0443, melissa.williams@sierraclub.org